Forums New posts Search forums.
More than 16 tap anisotropic filtering?
More than 16 tap anisotropic filtering? Joined Oct 2, Messages 13, 2. I've been wondering this for a while, how come we are still stuck at 16x 16 tap Anisotropic filter even today when we could already have 24x, 32x or even 64x sampling.
I've started wondering this even more when I've noticed a setting in Unreal Engine games where you could input a number of taps beyond 16 without game crashing or anything.
Which makes me wonder, are for example 64 taps actually used and you can't actually see any difference beyond 16x or is the game simply ignoring higher values and still only using 16x filtering. I was unable to make a comparison because of how that game works so maybe someone who knows Unreal Engine 3x. Joined May 4, Messages 0. The only game which i know is possible to be forced to use more than 16x af samples is brothers a tale of two sons and it can use up to x32 samples of anisotropy filtering.
Brothers is made with ue3 so natural assumption would be "other ue3 games can do the same" but from my experience it is not so obvious. For example let's take borderlands series. Whole series is made with ue3, in first game you can enable msaa up to 16x samples but in borderlands 2 and pre-sequel it is simply not working anymore even if such setting is available in.
Hm, I'll have to check this out. Gotta find a map that has an open spawn area so I can make consistent comparisons when map loads. Mostly because 16x Aniso is so freaking cheap, so why not use something higher. Agree, in most games x16 samples is not taking fps at all so i do not understand why not to extend it with more samples.
Anyway, currently a lot companies prefer to give to players sick options of aa for example ssaa x16 instead of providing more options for anisotropy filtering.
BTW, current hardware and software, both, are limited and can't render 4K with 16x ssaa. Joined Jul 18, Messages 2, 0. Aquinus Resident Wat-man. Joined Jan 28, Messages 11, 3. The question isn't if a graphics card can do more than 16 samples, the question is if there is really any reason to do more than 16 taps of AF.
Consider for a moment that AF is supposed to improve the quality of textures as weird angles in relation to the camera, add some distance and it gets worse.
There does come a point where there are only so many pixels you can work with on the screen and you can only improve the quality of a texture so much before extra samples are wasted no improvement.
I would argue that there are a lot of cases where scenes don't even need 16 tap AF and would look just as good with 8. My point is that higher than 16 in most cases probably will have incredibly limited benefits where even 16 doesn't benefit every scene. You would probably get better benefit from higher resolution textures than you would from higher AF levels because AF only is as good as the textures that are getting filtered.
Joined Sep 17, Messages 11, 5.Menu Menu.
Search Everywhere Threads This forum This thread. Search titles only. Search Advanced search…. Everywhere Threads This forum This thread. Search Advanced…. Log in. NeoGAF Gold. Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
After reading through this threadthat still seems to be the common consensus. The results were I don't know for certain what values these settings pertain to, but I think it's safe to assume that they're 16x, 8x, 4x, and 2x or Off, respectively.
What I expected was little difference in performance between the Ultra and Low settings. Vsync and Triple Buffering are set to Off, and I'm using exclusive fullscreen. The only change between each shot is the in-game Texture Filtering setting. DonMigs85 Member. Sep 3, 26, 2 35 Philippines. JaseC gave away the keys to the kingdom. Jul 30, 73, 6 1, Western Australia.
I always set AF to 8x myself. Even in the best of cases I can barely tell the difference between it and 16x. SixFourMike Member. Feb 24, 5, 93 Good thread and comparison.In 3D computer graphicsanisotropic filtering abbreviated AF is a method of enhancing the image quality of textures on surfaces of computer graphics that are at oblique viewing angles with respect to the camera where the projection of the texture not the polygon or other primitive on which it is rendered appears to be non- orthogonal thus the origin of the word: "an" for not"iso" for sameand "tropic" from tropismrelating to direction; anisotropic filtering does not filter the same in every direction.
Like bilinear and trilinear filteringanisotropic filtering eliminates aliasing effects,   but improves on these other techniques by reducing blur and preserving detail at extreme viewing angles.
Anisotropic filtering is relatively intensive primarily memory bandwidth and to some degree computationallythough the standard space—time tradeoff rules apply and only became a standard feature of consumer-level graphics cards in the late s. From this point forth, it is assumed the reader is familiar with MIP mapping. If we were to explore a more approximate anisotropic algorithm, RIP mapping, as an extension from MIP mapping, we can understand how anisotropic filtering gains so much texture mapping quality.
Thus, when sampling to avoid aliasing on a high-frequency axis, the other texture axes will be similarly downsampled and therefore potentially blurred. These anisotropically downsampled images can be probed when the texture-mapped image frequency is different for each texture axis. Therefore, one axis need not blur due to the screen frequency of another axis, and aliasing is still avoided.
Unlike more general anisotropic filtering, the MIP mapping described for illustration is limited by only supporting anisotropic probes that are axis-aligned in texture spaceso diagonal anisotropy still presents a problem, even though real-use cases of anisotropic texture commonly have such screenspace mappings.
Although implementations are free to vary their methods, MIP mapping and the associated axis aligned constraints mean it is suboptimal for true anisotropic filtering and is used here for illustrative purposes only. Fully anisotropic implementation is described below. In layman's terms, anisotropic filtering retains the "sharpness" of a texture normally lost by MIP map texture's attempts to avoid aliasing.
Anisotropic filtering can therefore be said to maintain crisp texture detail at all viewing orientations while providing fast anti-aliased texture filtering. Different degrees or ratios of anisotropic filtering can be applied during rendering and current hardware rendering implementations set an upper bound on this ratio. In practice what this means is that in highly oblique texturing situations a filter will be twice as sharp as a filter it will display frequencies double that of the filter.
However, most of the scene will not require the filter; only the more oblique and usually more distant pixels will require the sharper filtering. This means that as the degree of anisotropic filtering continues to double there are diminishing returns in terms of visible quality with fewer and fewer rendered pixels affected, and the results become less obvious to the viewer.
When one compares the rendered results of an anisotropically filtered scene to a filtered scene, only a relatively few highly oblique pixels, mostly on more distant geometry, will display visibly sharper textures in the scene with the higher degree of anisotropic filtering, and the frequency information on these few filtered pixels will only be double that of the filter.
The performance penalty also diminishes because fewer pixels require the data fetches of greater anisotropy. In the end it is the additional hardware complexity vs. Applications and users are then free to adjust this trade-off through driver and software settings up to this threshold. True anisotropic filtering probes the texture anisotropically on the fly on a per-pixel basis for any orientation of anisotropy. In graphics hardware, typically when the texture is sampled anisotropically, several probes texel samples of the texture around the center point are taken, but on a sample pattern mapped according to the projected shape of the texture at that pixel,  although earlier software methods have used summed area tables.
Each anisotropic filtering probe is often in itself a filtered MIP map sample, which adds more sampling to the process. Sixteen trilinear anisotropic samples might require samples from the stored texture, as trilinear MIP map filtering needs to take four samples times two MIP levels and then anisotropic sampling at tap needs to take sixteen of these trilinear filtered probes.
However, this level of filtering complexity is not required all the time. There are commonly available methods to reduce the amount of work the video rendering hardware must do.
The anisotropic filtering method most commonly implemented on graphics hardware is the composition of the filtered pixel values from only one line of MIP map samples. In general the method of building a texture filter result from multiple probes filling a projected pixel sampling into texture space is referred to as "footprint assembly", even where implementation details vary. The sample count required can make anisotropic filtering extremely bandwidth -intensive.
Multiple textures are common; each texture sample could be four bytes or more, so each anisotropic pixel could require bytes from texture memory, although texture compression is commonly used to reduce this. A video display device can easily contain over two million pixels, and desired application framerates are often upwards of 60 frames per second.
As a result, the required texture memory bandwidth may grow to large values.
Subscribe to RSS
Ranges of hundreds of gigabytes per second of pipeline bandwidth for texture rendering operations is not unusual where anisotropic filtering operations are involved. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This article may need to be rewritten to comply with Wikipedia's quality standardsas much of it is formatted more like a textbook than like an encyclopedia.Home Discussions Workshop Market Broadcasts.
Change language. Install Steam. Store Page. Global Achievements. Fonzie View Profile View Posts. Is it just me or dose 16x Anisotropic Filtering doesn't seem to be enough some how. I mean the textures of the road when your driving seem to be blurry, such as road lines. Anyway to improve this beyond the games 16x or is this a draw distance related issue? Showing 1 - 11 of 11 comments. Increase your shader quality.
I have every setting maxed out apart from the Advanced Graphic Settings. Invisible View Profile View Posts.What is Anisotropic Filtering (AF) as Fast as Possible - CORRECTED
There is a blur effect that for my taste starts very early. Maybe you have it still enabled? Hmm well i do have any kind of blur effect disabled, on DoF is enabled which is not so bad. I turned it off in game, the anisotropic filter, and turned it on in my gpu's control panel, it fixed this issue for me. Thanks bro, i did the same and it works great from nvidia control panel.
Originally posted by Fonzie :. Hyuna View Profile View Posts. Btw what monitor are u guys using? It works then. You have to do it every start, thought. Per page: 15 30 Date Posted: 18 Apr, pm.
Anisotropic Filtering in Modern Game Engines, Is 16x AF still considered cheap?
Posts: Discussions Rules and Guidelines. Note: This is ONLY to be used to report spam, advertising, and problematic harassment, fighting, or rude posts. All rights reserved. All trademarks are property of their respective owners in the US and other countries. Some geospatial data on this website is provided by geonames.I've talked about Bilinear vs.
Bicubic filtering before in the context of 2D images, but bilinear filtering is a key ingredient in 3D graphics, too. When a texture is applied to a polygon, the texture may be scaled up or down to fit, depending on your screen resolution. This is done via bilinear filtering.
A full discussion of 3D graphics is way outside the scope of this post-- plus I don't want to bore you to death with concepts like trilinear filtering and mip-mapping. But I do want to highlight one particular peculiarity of bitmap scaling in 3D graphics. As you rotate a texture-mapped polygon away from the viewer, simple bilinear filtering and mip-mapping cause the texture to lose detail as the angle increases: Now, some detail loss with distance is intentional.
That's essentially what mip-mapping is. Much more detail should be retained into the distance. And that's what anisotropic filtering does : Because you're typically viewing most of the polygons in the world at an angle at any given time, anisotropic filtering has a profound impact on image quality.
Here are some screenshots I took from the PC game FlatOut which illustrate the dramatic difference between standard filtering and anisotropic filtering: Standard filtering 16x Anisotropic filtering These are detail elements cropped from the full-size x screenshots: standardanisotropic. Proper anisotropic filtering is computationally expensiveeven on dedicated 3D hardware. And the performance penalty increases with resolution. ATI was the first 3d hardware vendor to introduce some anisotropic filtering optimizations -- some would say shortcuts-- in their cards which allowed much higher performance.
There is one small caveat, however: at some angles, textures don't get fully filtered. ATI effectively optimized for common angles you'd see in 3D level geometry floor, walls, ceiling at the cost of the others. For better or worse, these optimizations are now relatively standard now even on nVidia cards. I think it's a reasonable tradeoff for the increased image quality and performance.
Game Development Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional and independent game developers. It only takes a minute to sign up. I am loading a texture and using glGenerateMipmap on it to achieve some level of mipmaping. The texture rendered by nVidia is not with Anisotropic filtering, and that rendered by intel HD 3k is. How to manually adjust this feature for different GPU?
Also the tiling of the texture is much more apparent on nVidia!! In the description of glGenerateMipmap it is specified that the way glGenerateMipmap works is different for different implementations of OpenGL.
Or am I better of mipmaping the texture myself? Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Home Questions Tags Users Unanswered. How to achieve anisotropic filtering Ask Question. Asked 6 years, 2 months ago. Active 5 years ago.
Viewed 12k times. I get different result on nVidia gt m, and on Intel HD With nVidia the texture is repeating faster than on Intel. Maybe there is something else wrong than the mipmap generation. What could be wrong? This may override what the application requests. That does not explain the diffirence in tiling though. Active Oldest Votes. EnoughTea 2, 13 13 silver badges 16 16 bronze badges. Even though this extension is still not core in OpenGL, if you have an implementation that supports sampler objects, then you can set this per-sampler instead of per-texture.
The GL specification does not list it as a per-sampler state since it is an extensionbut it is. Coleman Jan 27 '14 at Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Sign up using Facebook. Sign up using Email and Password. Post as a guest Name.The filtering method that achieves the best results today is anisotropic filtering. As the name suggests, the texels are not gleaned from a symmetrical shape, but rather by using an irregular pattern adjusted to the perspective anisotropic shape.
The form of this shape is not standardized - usually, however, rectangular or trapezoidal patterns or parallelograms are used, the shapes of which depend on the angle of the surface. The number of texels taken into account for filtering determines the filter level. With 1x, anisotropic filtering offers eight texels. With current graphics cards the filter level can be set in the driver.
The maximum value is 16x, but manufacturers do not use all interim steps. The most common are: 2x 16 texels4x 32 texels8x 64 texels and 16x texels. As the filtering increases, the computing time increases accordingly, to a considerable degree. This screenshot shows the colored mipmap levels. Left is just trilinear.
You can see that the LOD is pushed backwards. Anisotropic filtering always functions in interaction with bilinear or trilinear filtering. The bilinear variation is logically faster but has one disadvantage: the visible edge on the mipmap transitions. The best result is achieved with the more computing-intensive trilinear anisotropic filtering, in which mipmap transitions are calculated from the neighboring textures.
Current page: Anisotropic Filtering. Anisotropic Filtering Difference between minimal and currently maximum 16x anisotropic filtering. See all comments 0. No comments yet Comment from the forums.